Go back

INDEX

  • Basilar Skull Fracture
  • Context
  • Recommended Treatment
  • Criteria For Hospital Admission
  • Criteria for Transfer to Neurosurgical Facility
  • Criteria For Close Observation And/or Consult
  • Criteria For Safe Discharge Home
  • Quality Of Evidence?
  • Related Information
  • Relevant Resources

Basilar Skull Fracture

Neurological, Trauma

Last Reviewed on Apr 30, 2017
Read Disclaimer

Context

  • Classic clinical exam findings should be considered a positive diagnosis
  • High blunt force – 50% have another intracranial injury; 5-15% have C spine fracture
  • Complications relatively rare but commonly missed
  • associated with significant morbidity/mortality
  • CT scan is positive in only ~50% cases (still the gold standard though)
  • Adverse outcomes more common when CT positive
  • Complications:
    • CSF leak
    • Hearing loss
    • Cranial nerve palsy (entrapment > transection)
    • Cerebrovascular injury (Carotid > Vertebral)
    • Intracranial hemorrhage
  • Pitfalls:
    • Delayed development of clinical signs of complications (CSF leak, cranial nerve deficit, complications of carotid/vertebral artery injury routinely present later than 48 hours)
    • Intracranial hemorrhage may develop/evolve over 12-24 hours
    • Meningitis may further complicate CSF leak in up ~6%
    • Carotid artery injury poorly correlated with presence of involvement of carotid canal
    • Missed carotid artery injury associated with severe permanent neurologic deficit or mortality in up to 50%

Recommended Treatment

  • No role for prophylactic antibiotics in CSF leak (Cochrane Review 2015)
  • Patients with CSF leak should be followed up at 7 days to ensure resolution
  • Suggest CT angiogram to check for cerebrovascular injury if:

a. CT evidence of basal skull fracture involving carotid canal OR

b. CT evidence of any basilar skull fracture AND:

i. Middle cranial fossa involvement (temporal/sphenoid bone)

ii. Any associated intracranial hemorrhage

iii. Pneumocephalus or sphenoid sinus air fluid level

c. Clinical or CT evidence of basilar skull fracture AND high-risk clinical features:

i. High force mechanism

ii. GCS < 6, Diffuse axonal injury

iii. Focal neurologic deficits, visual changes

Criteria For Hospital Admission

  • Altered LOC
  • Presence of non-surgical ICH or high-risk features (eg. high force, altered GCS/DAI, posterior fossa involvement, suspicion of vascular injury) requiring close observation/repeat/further imaging
  • Cerebrovascular injury requiring observation/further management
  • Factors preventing safe observation/discharge planning/adequate follow-up
  • Suspicion of meningitis in context of known/suspected CSF leak

Criteria for Transfer to Neurosurgical Facility

  • Surgical or high-risk ICH requiring Neurosurgical intervention
  • Need for further imaging (CT scan, CT angiogram)
  • Need for management or further assessment for complications:
    • Cerebrovascular injury
    • Suspected cranial nerve entrapment or transection
    • CSF leak (especially if failed to resolve at 7 days)

Criteria For Close Observation And/or Consult

  • CSF leak (consider consult to establish follow-up pathway)
  • Cranial nerve deficit (consult to establish follow-up pathway)
  • Proven or suspected cerebrovascular injury
  • Non-surgical ICH (high-risk to establish need for transfer/admit/observe/repeat imaging)
  • High-risk mechanism or involvement of middle or posterior cranial fossa (observe for 12-24 hours for delayed ICH)

Criteria For Safe Discharge Home

  • Patient adequately assessed/imaged:
    • CT/CT angiogram
    • Cranial nerve examination including visual acuity
    • C spine
  • Clear return instructions for signs/symptoms of:
    • Intracranial hemorrhage
    • Visual change/loss
    • Cranial nerve deficit
    • CSF leak AND/OR signs/symptoms of meningitis
  • Establishment of specialist follow-up for presence of CSF leak or cranial nerve deficit at time of discharge
  • EP or GP reassessment at 7 days for reassessment for development of cranial nerve deficit, new or persistent CSF leak, signs/symptoms of cerebrovascular injury

Quality Of Evidence?

Justification

Low to very low-level evidence for Admission/Transfer/Observation/Followup criteria – no established guidelines or large studies

Low

Antibiotic prophylaxis in CSF leak = Medium (Cochrane systematic review showed trend toward benefit but confidence interval crosses 1  –  likely more studies required). No current evidence to support.

Moderate

Canadian CT head rule provides high-level evidence as to when to consider CT head in blunt head trauma.

High

Low-level evidence for CT angiogram criteria

Low

Related Information

OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION

Reference List

Relevant Resources

RELEVANT CLINICAL RESOURCES

View all Resources

RESOURCE AUTHOR(S)

COMMENTS (0)

Add public comment…