Myocarditis – Diagnosis and Treatment
Cardiovascular, Inflammatory
Context
- Myocarditis is a challenging and potentially life-threatening condition that is underdiagnosed in the emergency department.
- Complications include cardiomyopathy, heart failure, arrhythmias, and fulminant myocarditis.
- It is more common in males and younger populations.
- Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the cardiac musculature as seen on biopsy.
- Causes include:
- Infectious
- Most commonly viral.
- Consider bacterial, fungal, protozoal, and parasitic.
- Immune-mediated and systemic disorders
- Allergens including drug hypersensitivity, tetanus toxoid, vaccines, serum sickness.
- Autoimmune such as IBD, giant cell, SLE, scleroderma, thyrotoxicosis, GPA, Kawasaki’s, rheumatic heart disease.
- Alloantigens such as in heart transplant rejection.
- Toxins
- Alcohol, amphetamines, anthracyclines, heavy metals, carbon monoxide, catecholamines, radiation.
- Infectious
Clinical presentation
- Variable clinical presentation
- Symptoms include dyspnea and chest pain (most common), as well as fatigue, palpitations, and edema.
- Presentation may range from subclinical or mild symptoms to severe heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and sudden cardiac death.
- Viral prodrome often present including fever, malaise, myalgia, cough, and diarrhea 2 weeks prior to cardiac dysfunction.
- Suspect myocarditis in patients with
- Heart failure or cardiogenic shock with ventricular dysfunction and no clear etiology.
- Signs of MI with minimal or absent cardiovascular risk factors or normal angiogram and no clear etiology.
- Pediatric patient with signs of cardiac dysfunction, especially with viral prodrome.
- Patient with suspected sepsis who worsens with IV fluids and has signs of volume overload.
Diagnostic Process
- Gold standard for diagnosis is endomyocardial biopsy (EMB)
- Limited role in emergency room setting as it is not readily available, has a high sampling error, and has relatively low yield in terms of impact on patient management.
- Recommended approach is based on 3 tiered classification as adapted from Sagar et al. 2012 when myocarditis is suspected.
- Possible subclinical acute myocarditis
- No cardiovascular symptoms but at least one of:
- Elevated cardiac biomarkers.
- ECG findings consistent with cardiac injury.
- Abnormal cardiac function on echo.
- CMRI findings.
- Probable acute myocarditis
- Cardiovascular symptoms AND at least one of:
- Elevated cardiac biomarkers.
- ECG findings consistent with cardiac injury.
- Abnormal cardiac function on echo.
- CMRI findings.
- Definite myocarditis
- Histological or immune-histological evidence of myocarditis.
- Cardiovascular symptoms AND at least one of:
- No cardiovascular symptoms but at least one of:
- Possible subclinical acute myocarditis
- Recommended investigations
- Labs: CBC, lytes, renal/liver function, CRP, troponin, BNP
- Troponin levels are commonly elevated in myocarditis, but their absence is not sensitive in myocarditis and should not be used for prognosis.
- Over 50% of patients will have elevated BNP, but the absence of BNP does not rule out myocarditis.
- CRP positive in majority of patients, but is not specific for myocarditis.
- CBC showing eosinophilia may suggest eosinophilic myocarditis.
- ECG
- Useful to evaluate for ST/T wave changes, AV blocks.
- CXR
- Abnormal in 50% of patients including cardiomegaly, pulmonary edema, and pleural effusions.
- Not sensitive.
- Echocardiogram
- Assessing for global or regional ventricular dysfunction, wall motion abnormalities, and pericardial effusions.
- If formal TTE unavailable, POCUS is useful to assess for gross signs of cardiac dysfunction or for pulmonary edema.
- Consider cardiovascular MRI (CMRI)
- Patients must be clinically stable.
- Findings must be consistent with myocarditis according to Lake-Louise criteria (specialist interpretation recommended.)
- Useful in low risk myocarditis to differentiate between myocarditis and ACS or in intermediate risk myocarditis for diagnosis.
- Limited role in high risk myocarditis.
- Labs: CBC, lytes, renal/liver function, CRP, troponin, BNP
Recommended Treatment
- Treatment should be tailored around the etiology of the myocarditis, risk stratification, and clinical presentation.
- For hemodynamically unstable patients
- May require inotropic support, diuresis, and ventilator support.
- Norepinephrine is the preferred vasopressor in myocarditis.
- Avoid excessive IV fluids which may worsen symptoms.
- For hemodynamically stable patients
- If heart failure is present, standard heart failure therapy may be used including ACEi/ARB and beta blocker with consideration of MRA.
- Immunosuppressive agents should only be considered for subgroups of patients with specific etiologies of myocarditis including giant cell myocarditis, sarcoidosis, or other systemic autoimmune diseases, which require EMB.
- Immunotherapy is not recommended as it has not been shown to affect outcomes and may have significant side effects.
- Antiviral therapy should not routinely be used.
- NSAIDs not recommended as it may worsen mortality in myocarditis, as seen in experimental models, although clinical trial data is lacking.
- Physical exercise should be restricted in the acute phase, which will require follow-up 6 months after onset of the disease (expert opinion.)
- Disposition
- All patients with suspected acute myocarditis should be admitted to hospital and those requiring vasopressors or ventilator support require ICU admission.
- 50% recover fully.
- 30% will decompensate.
- 20% require transplantation.
Quality Of Evidence?
High
We are highly confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. There is a wide range of studies included in the analyses with no major limitations, there is little variation between studies, and the summary estimate has a narrow confidence interval.
Moderate
We consider that the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. There are only a few studies and some have limitations but not major flaws, there are some variations between studies, or the confidence interval of the summary estimate is wide.
Low
When the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. The studies have major flaws, there is important variations between studies, of the confidence interval of the summary estimate is very wide.
Justification
Overall evidence for diagnosis of myocarditis is mixed as there have been multiple proposed definitions with no clear universally agreed upon criteria. We have chosen a clinical approach as suggested by Sagar et al. as this is more relevant in an emergency department setting.
Overall evidence for the treatment of myocarditis is poor given the lack of large multi-centre randomized controlled trials. The recommendations are based on the consensus of the Canadian and European guidelines utilizing existing data available and expert opinion.
Related Information
Reference List
Caforio ALP, Pankuweit S, Arbustini E, Basso C, Gimeno-Blanes, Felix SB, Fu M, Helio T, Heymans S, Jahns R. 2013. Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Euro Heart J. 34:2636-2648.
Ezekowitz JA, O’Meara E, McDonald MA, Abrams H, Chan M, Ducharme A, Giannetti N, Grzeslo A, Hamilton PG, Heckman GA. 2017. 7.5.5 Myocarditis in: 2017 Comprehensive update of the Canadian society guidelines for the management of Heart failure. Can J Cardiol. 33: 1342-1433.
Gottlieb M, Bridwell R, Petrak V, Long B. 2021. Diagnosis and management of myocarditis: An evidence-based review for the emergency medicine clinician. J Emerg Med. 61(3): 222-233.
Sagar S, Liu PP, Cooper LT. 2012. Myocarditis. Lancet. 379(9817): 738-747.
Sinagra G, Anzini M, Pereira NL, Bussani R, Finocchiaro G, Bartunek J, Merlo M. 2016. Myocarditis in clinical practice. Mayo Clin Proc. 91(9): 1256-1266.
RESOURCE AUTHOR(S)
DISCLAIMER
The purpose of this document is to provide health care professionals with key facts and recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients in the emergency department. This summary was produced by Emergency Care BC (formerly the BC Emergency Medicine Network) and uses the best available knowledge at the time of publication. However, healthcare professionals should continue to use their own judgment and take into consideration context, resources and other relevant factors. Emergency Care BC is not liable for any damages, claims, liabilities, costs or obligations arising from the use of this document including loss or damages arising from any claims made by a third party. Emergency Care BC also assumes no responsibility or liability for changes made to this document without its consent.
Last Updated Jan 19, 2022
Visit our website at https://emergencycarebc.ca
COMMENTS (0)
Add public comment…
POST COMMENT
We welcome your contribution! If you are a member, log in here. If not, you can still submit a comment but we just need some information.